![]() ![]() ![]() If these numbers don’t mean anything to you, let’s look at it this way- just imagine having to procure other routers with several excessive features that add to the cost but actually prove to be superfluous. ![]() The SG-1100 model also runs on a dual Cortex-A53 ARM processor cores and an extensive array of high-speed IOs. It operates on such a powerful energy-efficient 64-bit Marvell ARMADA 3720 network processing system-on-chip. While you see a nice white and clean, elegant packaging, in a small, almost a palm-size device, underneath it is a highly flexible modular arrangement. The NetGate SG-1100 comes in a fanless, sleek, compact, and much lighter box ,significantly smaller than the other boxes in the SG line. In this article, we’re looking closely at the key features of NetGate’s pfSense SG-1100, the pros and cons of using one, system requirements to identify if it fits your setup, and whether or not these are worth purchasing. Users who have switched to this router from previously using one of its greatest competitors like SG-3100 or Ubiquiti Edge Router 4 didn’t find any performance issues or network speed problems.They even found the pfSense SG-1100 to meet their expectations when it comes to IDS/IPS application, VPN routing, and firewall use. If you are looking for a security gateway firewall appliance for home or office use, and you’re running under a 500 Mbps connection, the pfSense SG-1100 offers some promising features worth looking at. The NetGate 1100 is ideal for small and home offices, home labs, virtual offices, small and medium businesses, and corporate branch offices that need a 1Gbps performance firewall. While being slightly more expensive than SG-1000 at USD $179, the SG-1100 is said to bring in 5x more performance. This new design of the pfSense firewall has enormous upgrades from its SG-1000 predecessor. The SG-1100 is a firewall and router in a single form factor released by NetGate as an addition to the company’s popular ARM-based desktop appliance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |